How Do You Sleep at Night?
Two
They apparently won their case in court, but the Kirlin's are disputing the case. In the original case, the McLean and Stevens used a trail across the property, called 'Edie's path' (too cute guys), as proof that they had been using the property a long, long time. Now the Kirlin's are claiming that the trail is new and that they have photographic proof. The lawyer for Mclean and 'Edie' (sounds like a 70's sitcom) are saying that legally, so what, they should have brought this up the first time.
Nicely done. But there's more. They are upset that other people have a problem with this and outraged that anyone would think they fabricated this trail of evidence, "I became an attorney because I believe in the law," Stevens said, choking up as she spoke. "I tried cases and I always instructed my witnesses to tell the truth. I would not go into a courtroom and lie. Any suggestion we had plotted to seize the land is just false."
Why would anyone think that? Oh, except that you trespassed on your neighbor's property and then claim you own it.
Like the title says, How Do You Sleep at Night?

2 Comments:
There was another recent Boulder land-grab case associated with "Revised Statute 2477" which in some ways is an even more insidious land-grab law (it is often called the Trespasser Loophole).
Here's a link to information about RS 2477:
RS 2477
Here's are links to more information about the case, including the role of Daily Camera columnist Silvia Pettem and her husband Ed Raines, whose participation in the land grab attempt was similar to that of Stevens and McClean in the other case (including alleged trespassing and evidence fabrication by public figures who hold influential positions):
Balarat Creek Ranch
Judge orders Ramey to pay Boslough $33,097 --Rebukes Pettem for misrepresentation (PDF file of Dec. 5, 2007 order)
Prof. Rothman discusses Silvia Pettem's lack of qualifications (HTML file of report)
(PDF file of Pettem report)
Ramey fails to produce Pettem's "phantom deed" (PDF file of Judge Whalen's Aug. 27, 2007 order)
Ramey fails to produce evidence of adverse use (PDF file of Judge Mallard's Feb 16, 2007 order)
Thanks for the info. Maybe Boulder has some sort of culture of entitlement.
Post a Comment
<< Home